The use of this amendment requires thorough reflection, firstly, due to the difficulty of measuring the coefficient of the pore pressure A with sufficient accuracy, and secondly, because its assessment, based only on the degree of soil overlaps, can apparently lead to Significant errors. In addition, the amount of amendment in the case of partially the soil is unknown. In the case of uncertainty, apparently, it is best to consider the sediment calculated without amendment, as the limiting value, also bringing the amount of amendment as an indicator of the uncertainty of the calculation. The calculation of precipitation is based on the assumption that the stresses acting on the soil during precipitation remain constant. This means that the load itself during sediment does not change. In the design, which is a non -festival connection between beams and columns, or with very flexible elements of the load on the foundation do not change during precipitation, and the calculation will closely correspond to what is actually happening. You can find out about proper nutrition at 15 weeks of pregnancy here. But if the design contains short hard elements that are rigidly related to each other, uneven precipitation leads to the redistribution of loads on foundations — the load on those supports that strive to settle more and increases by those that settle less. In this case, the redistribution of loads maximum precipitation is slightly reduced, and the minimum increases. Thus, in cases where the redistribution of the load in the course of precipitation depends on the rigidity of the structure and the characteristics of the compressibility of the soil, we come to statically indefinable conditions. Fixed loads can be found by attempts, starting from the loads corresponding to uniform precipitation. The precipitation is then calculated on these loads and the difference in sediment of neighboring columns is determined.
